My current homeowner’s insurance has the replacement cost of my home at $189,000. I’ve been shopping for insurance and I’ve gotten estimates anywhere from $250,000 to $700,000. Other agents say I am way under-insured. When I asked my current agent why they set the replacement cost so low, the agent said that I do not have to replace it with the exact same brick Victorian house, I can get a nice modular home for even less than $189,000. My question is why there is such a variation in replacement costs between agencies and why the current broker seems to think I deserve less than I have now?
$189,000 to $700,000 is a MONSTER discrepancy. I think you’ve got a big problem on your hands.
OK, first of all, it sounds like your current policy doesn’t COVER you for replacement coverage. Sounds like the policy is maybe written on an HO8 form, for "functional replacement cost" or "market value". You will need to ask your agent. The biggest problem come claim time, of course, isn’t if your house burns down – it’s if you have a PARTIAL loss. I’m sure you’re not going to want to replace your beautiful plaster ceilings with that fiberboard drop ceiling.
So, the first question is, are we ALL talking about COST TO REBUILD WITH LIKE KIND AND QUALITY. Because I’m betting dollars to donuts, with that discrepancy, it’s not really replacement cost.
Second, insurance companies are free to calculate it differently. Let’s take my house, for example. We have a house, we have a "detached" garage, and we have one roof, that goes over the house, covers part of the patio, and continues to the detached garage. One insurance company will consider everything under the same ROOF, part of the same structure – and another, won’t include the actual garage, in the calculation. So the calculation, between companies, for me, is a difference of about 500 square feet – which DOES make a significant difference in the total.
Third, agent error. newer, inexperienced agents might be using square footage of LIVING space, rather than the outside measurements of the house, in the calculations. They might be adding up the rooms, for their total, and discounting dead areas, hallways, etc. They might be deliberately underestimating the square footage, to "do you a favor" to get the lower price, or to get the lowest price to get you to give them the business. They haven’t had the experience of an errors and ommissions lawsuit due to an underinsurance claim on a partial loss. Or they’re not planning on staying in business long enough for it to matter to them.
It all comes down to communication. You will HAVE to take the time to talk to each broker, and ask them to show you the square foot calculation worksheets. Have them justify the numbers. Maybe there’s a math error there, but YOU should have a pretty good idea how big your house is (from the outside) and what the average cost to rebuild in your area is. In my area, it’s about $200 per square foot. ASK your current broker what KIND of policy you have, and IF he can get you a true replacement cost policy, and if they can recalculate the square footage. Also ask, how the loss gets adjusted, if you have only a kitchen fire with $75,000 in damages. The answer to THAT might be a major eye opener.